|
When we look at multiple sclerosis
causes and the summary of MS research, you will certainly agree
with me that one thing is clear: multiple sclerosis causes are
still a collection of assumptions lacking definite, proven results.
Because of that, I will put
further possibilities for discussion.
Regarding the destruction of
the myelin sheath, I said already on our myelin site that chemicals have a fat
solving effect and are able to dissolve and destroy the myelin. Why does nobody
look into this direction?
It's because of the system.
Medical research has primarily the purpose of discovering and developing drugs
to treat health disorders. Assumed I am right that chemicals destroy the myelin
it will be impossible to treat this with other chemicals.
What about the
bacteria/virus theory?
It could be possible but then it should actually have been also
possible to isolate this virus after decades of research and develop a treatment
against provided it's one of the multiple sclerosis causes. If it's swine flue
they have a vaccine almost immediately at their fingertips. In case of MS, they
fail for long to develop one not to talk of finding a treatment to cure MS.
There is another
possibility.
The organism detects any destruction in its system and tries to
repair it. The destruction of myelin is such a case. Maybe they are right and it
is caused by inflammation. Then it is normal that white blood cells, T-cells
appear, as they are involved in fighting inflammatory processes independent of
whether these inflammations are caused by viruses or something else.
Questionable
however appears whether T-cells affect the myelin at all. They remain in
the areas of inflammation as long as they continue and keep trying to stop
the inflammation but without result. This is then wrongly interpreted as an
autoimmune reaction.
That in the area of lesions
macrophages are to be found, is normal, as they are involved in the healing
process of wounds.
It's hard to believe that
T-cells and macrophages should attack the own system. It's also possible that
it's a misinterpretation.
I have been always a lateral
thinker and thanks to people like many others, and me progress has been
possible. Because of this ability, we drive cars, planes fly in the sky and we
use the Internet.
Medical scientists have been
too often mistaken. So we should be careful in accepting everything they present
as the only and ultimate truth.
Once physicians used mercury
as the treatment for various diseases and they defended it persistent.
Today we know that it is a poison and damages our health.
Ignaz Philipp Semmelweis
(1819-1865) discovered in the middle of the 19th century that the incidences of
puerperal fever could be drastically cut by the use of hand disinfection.
Despite his discovery and
extraordinary success in reducing childbed fever by hand disinfection, he was
attacked by his colleagues. Only at the beginning of the 20th century, i.e. more
than 50 years later hand disinfection became popular with physicians.
The simpler a solution the more
difficult it is accepted by our scientific establishment.
Fact is however the
following.
You
can often read allergies would be autoimmune reactions whereby the chance to
be cured would be low. My experience with patients is that allergies can be treated
easily with diet. The success rate is 99 percent. One percent experiences significant improvement.
I had severe allergies and
asthma. When nothing else helped anymore, changing my diet did help and cured me
within 3 months - completely.
Something else is also fact.
There is no correlation in
first line between MS and latitude as far as it concerns exposure to sunshine
causing the body to build vitamin
D naturally. Actually, vitamin D is not even a vitamin but a prohormone. Only
the
metabolism transfers it into a hormone.
Of course, it sounds very logical especially against the background that you find the majority of MS
patients north and south of the 40th degree latitude with the core area in the
northern hemisphere. Interestingly enough, in Asia MS is hardly to find. Above
all, it is an easy explanation.
The big difference in
equatorial countries is that...
-
they are economically underprivileged compared to
industrial countries.
-
they are unable to buy all the junk food offered
in industrialized nations.
-
they eat very different
and more natural.
In autumn of 2009, I was in
a mission in Uganda. In the capital Kampala a few bigger supermarkets offer
imported foods. These are so horrible expensive that only few can buy them. Less
privileged people can't afford it at all.
The
difference in diet
Outside Kampala, you find
small stores and few smaller supermarkets selling convenience goods. What you find a lot
are farmer's markets offering tons of fruit and vegetables. That's what they eat most.
This is equal in all less privileged countries. Most of them are around the
equator.
How does nutrition look like
in industrial nations? Lots of fat, mostly of animal origin, mountains of
meat and meat products, much fish, bakery products, pasta, fast food, and junk
food.
The
difference is obvious, isn't it? These foods are multiple sclerosis causes and many more disorders that are chronic.
Fish oil
To complete the multiple
sclerosis causes, some say it's fish oil due to findings that MS is less
common in coastal areas of Norway than in the heartland. If there would be a
correlation, why is this different in Sweden and Finland? Both countries have a
long coastline and a fishing industry.
Truth
is...
Food plays the major role in
the development MS. The right diet provided, it's
the key to cure MS.
Nevertheless, researchers
around the world work on multiple sclerosis causes and the influence of vitamin D. In the meantime, they could prove
to some degree a correlation between them. The
number of participants in these studies is however quite small.
We are also doing some research
on vitamin D focusing on how to increase its supply in the most natural way.
We all add to putting the
puzzle together. In the end, we want to serve you in restoring your health.
Please get me right. I'm not
suggesting underestimating vitamin supply in your diet. That would be fatal.
What I suggest instead is to avoid seeing the lack of certain vitamins as the
cause of a disease. Things are more complex.
When it comes to health and
curing diseases, I give importance to the vitamin supply, as it is essential for
good health. Unfortunately, most people get too little of them as of many
nutrients in general.
I teach my clients how to cover
their need of vitamins and minerals from natural sources instead of taking
expensive artificial substitutes. It makes a significant difference in their
impact.
A big mistake is to
see the supply of vitamin D isolated. This is a dead end.
To say it
repeatedly, multiple sclerosis causes are not some "isolated ingredients".
MS is a multilayer disease of complex causes and we need to see the whole
picture.
Engrave the following
sentence deep into your mind and take it very serious:
Many
diseases of our time are the result of a biochemical imbalance
of the human organism caused by diet.
Dietetic
treatment it is a holistic process. It influences many aspects of the body at
the same time, restores the biochemical balance and eliminates multiple
sclerosis causes altogether.
Return from multiple sclerosis causes to MS symptoms
At the end of that page, you find a link to part 1 - MS research.
Return from multiple sclerosis causes to
Multiple Sclerosis Symptoms
|
